Dear @pietro . (cc: @mh973 , @lvinarcsik , @seplute )
Great to hear the team is back on the case to get these questionable calibrations cleaned up, changed, removed, or edited with better expert explanations.
Input for the team:
1.) I have not seen questionable calibrations #2, #3, #4, #5, #9 or #11 in quite some time, These may have already been removed. It was quite noticeable and a great improvement not to see these in the dataset over the past 6-8 weeks. Thank you.
2.) Questionable calibrations #6, #7, #8, and #12 were recently discussed above. Still seeing these in the dataset and while advanced players know to answer “flowing” new players will likely be confused given the conflicting sight of an apparent stall in the central vessel and unclear outlining. Better explanation needed at a minimum for these. (Perhaps it would just be better to just put these in a training video to show the subtlety around what is the targeted vessel and what is not.)
3.) Questionable calibration #1 seems to have reappeared just lately and needs to be removed again.
4.) I also have identified questionable calibrations #10, #13, #14, and #15 that need attention. Some of these have been observed since the original reporting 2 months ago. I can give you details on these when you are ready.
I have added a comment to the comment fields for each of these questionable calibrations that should be string searchable, e.g. “Questionable Calibration #1”. (Or you can just look for calibration movies that have lots of comments and you’ll probably find the same ones.)
Thanks for addressing these concerns.